Role of an Accident Reconstructionist in Your Personal Injury Case

Lauren S.
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
I was in an auto accident and wasnโ€™t sure the process of how to handle it and get the care that I needed. As soon as I found Ryan, him and his team were able to walk me through the process, answered all of my questions and were super attentive throughout. They really care for the well-being of their clients. I would highly recommend LA Century Law!
Jocelyn Bautista
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
The people who assisted me have been very kind and clear at all times and explained any questions one may have.
Zelma Molina
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
I give 5 star โญ they were with me from the start to the end! Very satisfied im happy with service!
Nikki R.
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Attorney Daneshrad is very professional and courteous. I called him after being involved in a rear ender. I didnโ€™t know anything about anything when it came to the process for making a claim after a car accident. Everyone at his office including Jennifer did everything in their power to make sure I was taken care of.

They made doctors appointments and regularly called to check-in on me. We ended up having to file a lawsuit. Three months after we did, attorney Daneshrad called me with great news! We had a settlement offer. It was for a lot more than I could have imagined. It has been three weeks since the settlement and he still calls me to check in on my injuries. You can tell he really cares about. He isnโ€™t just about the numbers. Thank you attorney Daneshrad! And happy holidays!
Cal Wong
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Zeidy and Eric have been a tremendous help with my auto accident case. They got me the best medical care/treatment I could get for my back injury and got fought for the settlement they believed I deserved. The case finally closed after a year of medical treatments and negotiations. I had many questions through emails and messages that were answered fairly quickly. I would say donโ€™t hesitate to message a couple days later if they donโ€™t respond back to a message since they are very busy with many cases at once. Iโ€™m very satisfied with the service and care they put into my case. I would definitely recommend them as a law firm just as my friend recommended them to me.
Eli D
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Ryan and his team were so incredible. They helped me after being involved in an accident and Iโ€™m super appreciative.

Accident reconstructionists play an important role in personal injury cases, providing information and analysis that is not available in other ways. LA Century Law explains what an accident reconstructionist does and if you may need one for your case.

What is an Accident Reconstructionist?

An accident reconstructionist is an expert witness who investigates and analyzes accidents.

They gather data to determine how and why an accident occurred. Their analysis may be admitted in court in a car accident compensation claim.

What Does an Accident Reconstructionist Do?

An accident reconstructionist uses a scientific process to analyze a crash, reaching conclusions about how or why an accident occurred.

An accident reconstructionist may testify in court as to their findings.

What Information Will They Need?

An accident reconstructionist wants to know the following:

  • Why the crash occurred
  • How the crash occurred
  • Causes and contributing factors
  • Details about the crash

What Questions Will They Ask?

Specific questions that an accident reconstructionist may ask include the following:

  • How fast was each vehicle going at the time of impact?
  • What was the angle of impact?
  • Did either vehicle brake? If so, how much?
  • Is there grass present that could verify a door opening or separation of a tire?
  • Did the impact change the trajectory of each vehicle?
  • How did vehicles accelerate, decelerate, and rotate?
  • How did weather or road conditions affect the crash?

Who may use an accident reconstructionist in a personal injury claim?

Either the plaintiff or defendant may use an accident reconstructionist in a personal injury claim.

The expert may be used to prove facts relevant to the case or to disprove the other partyโ€™s case.

The Types of Evidence Used in Accident Reconstruction

Accident reconstructionists use the data available to them and gather new data to analyze an accident. They may consider the following:

  • Traffic collision reports
  • Photographs of vehicles and the accident scene
  • Witness testimony
  • Data event recorders
  • Vehicle inspections
  • Medical records, autopsy reports
  • Reports from first responders
  • Crash tests
  • Impact points on each vehicle
  • Vehicle damage and debris
  • Vehicle weight and specifications
  • Research and literature
  • Skid marks
  • Undercarriage damage
  • Vehicle resting places
  • Weather
  • Road conditions, road surfaces

There are many pieces of data and evidence that may be collected and used in accident reconstruction. While some of the data is provided by others, such as photos from the accident scene and vehicle specifications, the reconstruction process may take an investigative role in gathering new data.

How Accident Reconstructionists Recreate Crash Scenarios

Accident reconstructionists recreate crash scenarios by:

  • Collecting data
  • Analyzing data
  • Reporting their findings

Computer models are common, and simulations and photographic modeling can be used. Calculations can be done by hand.

Ideally, the reconstructionist will use multiple methods, reaching similar conclusions.

When To Consider Hiring an Accident Reconstructionist

You may consider hiring an accident reconstructionist if there are issues in dispute that canโ€™t be conclusively proven another way. For example, the defendant may agree that they are at fault.

The only question in the case is damages. In that case, you donโ€™t need to hire an accident reconstructionist to prove fault. However, if the defense says they are not at fault because they applied the brakes before the accident, you may need a reconstructionist to refute the claim.

You may need an accident reconstructionist to explain how a curved road caused the driver to lose control. They may investigate the angle of the road, speed, and driver steering. This information could also prove the fault of a government entity responsible for the road.

Not all cases need an accident reconstructionist. A lawyer can help you evaluate this need.

Who is qualified to be an accident reconstructionist?

There is no specific degree to be an accident reconstructionist, but it is usually grounded in math and engineering. A person must be qualified through training, knowledge, and experience.

How Accident Reconstruction Testimony Can Strengthen Your Claim

Accident reconstruction testimony can strengthen your claim by helping prove the following:

Fault

A driver may not be honest or witnesses may not accurately observe or quantify speed. Details gathered by accident reconstruction can prove who has legal fault for the accident.

Causation of damages

To receive personal injury compensation, the accident must be the cause of damages. Reconstruction may reveal that the accident was likely to have caused the victimโ€™s injuries.

Defending against accusations of negligence

If the defense raises comparative negligence, accident reconstruction may refute their claims.

Costs and Benefits of Using an Accident Reconstructionist

The cost of an accident reconstructionist depends on how complex the case is and whether the person testifies at trial. A lawyer can help you with a cost-benefit analysis of whether itโ€™s appropriate to use an expert in your case.

If I use an accident reconstructionist, will they testify in court?

An accident reconstructionist may be advisory or may be a witness. Not every accident reconstructionist ends up on the witness stand. A party may consult with an expert for their purposes. They may name the reconstructionist as a witness and use the information in settlement negotiations. If a case goes to trial, the accident reconstructionist may testify.

Cases for accident reconstructionists in California

The admission of accident reconstruction testimony has been a contested issue in California personal injury claims. In Solis v. Southern Ca. Rapid Transit Dist. (Cal. Ct. App. 1980), the court reversed judgment for the defense because they found there was no adequate foundation for the testimony of the defense accident reconstructionist. The court was skeptical of the experiments and whether conclusions were sound.

In Box v. California Date Growersโ€™ Assnโ€™, (Cal. Ct. App. 1976), the court said that the object of accident reconstruction is to reach satisfactory conclusions. Absolute accuracy is not required.

The court allowed testimony that was consistent with other evidence in the case.

Contact an Experienced Century City Personal Injury Lawyer

If youโ€™re considering an accident reconstructionist in your personal injury case, we invite you to contact LA Century Law. Talk to an experienced Century City personal injury lawyer about your claim. Call or message us now.

Get Help Now
With Your Personal Injury Case
Free Consultation

310-893-0553

Available 24/7

It’s easy to get started.

"*" indicates required fields

Name
Address
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
CALL US